Einfuhrung in die Philosophie.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Johannes Müller und die Philosophie
MICHAEL HAGNER and BETTINA WAHRING-SCHMIDT (eds), Johannes Muller und die Philosophie, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 1992, pp. 341, DM 88.00 (3-05-002232-9). Johannes Muller (1801-1858) is often referred to as the "father" of modern German physiology. His education and subsequent career coincided with the period during which the natural sciences were gradually emancipated from the "Queen of the scie...
متن کاملPhilosophie und die kognitiven Wissenschaften
Seit nunmehr fast zwei Jahrzehnten treffen sich alljährlich im August in Kirchberg am Wechsel (Niederösterreich) Philosophen und andere Wissenschaftler, die direkt oder indirekt mit Forschungen zu Ludwig Wittgenstein befaßt sind. Das diesjährige 16. Internationale Wittgenstein Symposium, das vom 15. bis 22. August 1993 stattfand, hatte das Thema Philosophie und die kognitiven Wissenschaften. Mi...
متن کاملHistorisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie
However, English nurses going to America and confused by the American educational and organizational system will find this not only a useful source book, but a comfort in the fact that although we are "two great nations separated by the same language", our problems in educating and providing a nursing service capable of meeting changing health needs are much the same. Not least of these is prov...
متن کاملHistorisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie
another book on that inexhaustible mine of information, the Salerno Regimen of Health. But never mind; there's a bit for everybody here. The palaeographer will enjoy pitting his skills against those of the editor in transcribing the text. The philologist can compare the Latin with its medieval German translation. The literary historian will benefit from Kurze's discussion of the verse forms use...
متن کاملLa Philosophie du remède
scruple then every prescription where this occurs has a serious error, and so, in a sense, invalidates Brownrigg's treatment. A drachm (3)=60 grains, whilst a scruple (3)=only 20 grains-an error of 1:3. Of less importance is to have equated the apothecary ounce (3) with that of the avoirdupois (oz) as there is a difference of 42.5 grains between them. It would thus seem that the editors have an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods
سال: 1909
ISSN: 0160-9335
DOI: 10.2307/2011349